Your responsibilities expand once the award is made
Your program delivery, finance, procurement, reporting, records, leadership certifications, contractor oversight, subrecipient monitoring, and closeout may involve different people. When ownership is unclear or systems are weak, ordinary administrative gaps can become compliance problems.
Understand where your award is exposed
A risk-based Federal Award Compliance Review can help you understand your award portfolio, applicable requirements, deadlines, internal controls, documentation practices, prior findings, and immediate exposure.
Explore the Federal Award Compliance Review
Build controls your staff can actually use
Your policies have to work in the organization you actually have. Internal controls and compliance systems should connect written requirements with staff responsibilities, workflows, evidence, compensating controls, and practical operating procedures.
Explore Internal Controls and Compliance Systems
Test your readiness before someone else does
Before an independent auditor or awarding agency reviews your award, a Federal Award Audit Readiness Review can test selected records, controls, procurement files, cost support, reporting, and documentation against applicable federal requirements.
Explore the Federal Award Audit Readiness Review
Add experienced capacity without adding another full-time position
If your federal portfolio is substantial or growing, ongoing fractional post-award compliance support can provide experienced oversight while your existing staff retain their operational roles.
Explore Fractional Post-Award Compliance Support
Build capacity rather than dependency
Your organization remains responsible for its decisions, reports, certifications, and records. The objective is to strengthen the systems and decision processes around that responsibility so your team can manage public funding more reliably over time.